![macphun creative kit discount macphun creative kit discount](https://wpuploads.appadvice.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/macphun-642x401.jpg)
That might not matter if you like Adobe's RAW processing, or pre-apply lots of Lr adjustments, but I like to be able to use a RAW as a base for adjustment, especially when doing B&W conversions.ĭxO can also do this AND send a RAW back to Lr with DxO adjustments, which is very cool (obviously it's really sending a RAW with parameters for adjustment). But that's only because I already have many of the tools in Aurora, which is why they are selling it separately from the Creative Kit I expect.Īlso, a big big big advantage of Macphun's plugins is that they can operate on RAW, not just TIFFs or PSDs.
![macphun creative kit discount macphun creative kit discount](https://coupons.ivoicesoft.com/stuff/product-image/screenshot/1000360-4604353-svg-kit-for-adobe-creative-suite-upgrade-license.jpg)
But out of the box I can't say it's much better than Lr, and not more than Nik. And you have more tools in one interface than with most HDR applications.
![macphun creative kit discount macphun creative kit discount](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/45ea7dc73c3df65978ca00fbc485da7c.jpg)
I've tried Aurora HDR, and it's nice, and primarily for the interface, since with that you can use layers as well. Nik's Silver efex has some more intelligence built into their zone-type adjustments, but I just think I like using layers more. Nor does Lr have that you have to go out to Ps to do stuff like that. The big advantage Macphun has over Nik is layers and layer masking. And at first I thought Macphun's stuff was sort of gimmicky in an iOS-filters kind of way.